Climate change shrinking glaciers faster than ever; 7 trillion tons lost since 2000

ABC News - Feb 20th, 2025

A recent study published in the journal Nature reveals that the world's mountain glaciers are melting at an accelerating pace, losing more than twice the amount of ice annually compared to the early 2000s. The study highlights that glaciers lost ice at a rate of about 255 billion tons per year from 2000 to 2011, which increased to approximately 346 billion tons per year over the next decade, culminating in a record 604 billion tons lost in 2023. The international research effort involved 233 estimates of changes in glacier weight and emphasized the alarming rate of ice loss, with Alaska's glaciers being the fastest melting and Central Europe's glaciers losing the largest percentage of ice. These findings underscore the urgent and escalating impact of climate change on global ice reserves.

The implications of the study are profound, as melting glaciers are a significant contributor to sea level rise, surpassed only by the thermal expansion of water. Experts like William Colgan and Gwenn Flowers warn that while some regions may temporarily benefit from increased water supply, the long-term consequences are dire as glaciers reach a point of no return. The findings also highlight the role of human-induced greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels in driving this change, as noted by University of Colorado ice scientist Ted Scambos. The study's comprehensive data may lead to even more dire predictions about future ice loss and its global impact, emphasizing the unsustainability of losing 5.5% of global ice volume in just over two decades.

Climate Change Greenhouse Gases Mountain Glaciers Ice Loss William Colgan Gwenn Flowers Ted Scambos Nature Journal Sea Level Rise

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

8.2

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a comprehensive and accurate account of the accelerated melting of mountain glaciers due to climate change, supported by credible sources and expert opinions. It effectively communicates the urgency of the issue and its implications for global sea levels and ecosystems. While the article excels in accuracy, timeliness, and public interest, it could benefit from greater transparency regarding the study's methodology and a broader range of perspectives to enhance balance and engagement. Overall, the article is a valuable contribution to the ongoing discourse on climate change, offering insights that are both informative and relevant to a wide audience.

Accuracy

The article provides a detailed account of the accelerated melting of mountain glaciers due to climate change, supported by a study published in the journal Nature. The key figures, such as the annual ice loss and total ice lost since 2000, align with the study's findings, indicating high factual accuracy. The sources cited, including quotes from glaciologists and Earth scientists, lend credibility to the claims. However, the article could improve by providing more context on the methodology used in the study and how these figures were derived. Overall, the factual basis of the article is strong, with minor areas needing further elaboration.

Balance

The article presents a balanced view by including perspectives from multiple scientists, both those involved in the study and external experts. This approach helps mitigate bias and provides a comprehensive understanding of the issue. However, the article primarily focuses on the scientific consensus and does not explore potential counterarguments or differing viewpoints, such as those from climate change skeptics. Including a broader range of perspectives could enhance the article's balance.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and uses clear, concise language to convey complex scientific information. It effectively communicates the urgency of the issue and the implications of glacier melting. However, the article could benefit from a more detailed explanation of scientific terms and processes for readers who may not be familiar with the subject matter. Overall, the article maintains a neutral tone and logical flow, making it accessible to a general audience.

Source quality

The article cites credible sources, including a study published in a reputable journal and quotes from recognized experts in glaciology and Earth sciences. The involvement of multiple scientists and institutions in the study adds to the reliability of the information presented. The article also references external experts who validate the study's findings, further enhancing source quality. However, the article could improve by providing more detail on the study's methodology and data sources.

Transparency

The article provides a clear overview of the study's findings and quotes from experts, but it lacks detailed transparency regarding the study's methodology and data collection process. While it mentions the number of estimates used, it does not explain how these estimates were derived or the specific methods employed in the study. Greater transparency in these areas would strengthen the article's credibility and help readers understand the basis for the claims made.