Claudia Sheinbaum denounces proposed US remittance tax as ‘unacceptable’

Al Jazeera - May 15th, 2025

Republicans in the United States Congress have proposed a new tax on remittances as part of a broader effort to curb undocumented immigration. This provision, part of a tax bill supported by President Donald Trump, would impose a 5-percent excise tax on remittances sent by non-citizens, including visa holders and permanent residents. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has strongly criticized the measure, calling it 'unacceptable' and highlighting the potential for double taxation, as Mexicans in the US already pay taxes. Sheinbaum has also reached out to other countries with large immigrant populations to express concern, emphasizing that this would not only affect Mexico but many Latin American countries as well.

The proposed remittance tax is seen as a deterrent to immigration, aligning with Trump's 'America First' agenda which aims to discourage immigration and promote mass deportation. Critics argue that the tax could destabilize impoverished regions abroad, potentially increasing undocumented migration instead of curbing it. While the bill is still under consideration in the House of Representatives, Sheinbaum and other leaders are urging Republicans to reconsider due to the unintended consequences. Despite the controversy, the Trump administration plans to continue pursuing measures to limit funds sent abroad by migrants, as evidenced by Trump's recent social media post about a Presidential Memorandum targeting remittances.

Donald Trump Republican Party Mexico Immigration Policy Economic Impact Us Congress Claudia Sheinbaum Remittance Tax Undocumented Immigration

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.2

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a comprehensive overview of the proposed remittance tax, presenting both the criticisms and justifications in a balanced manner. It accurately reflects the political and economic context, making it a timely and relevant piece. The use of credible sources, such as statements from political figures, enhances its reliability, although incorporating more diverse perspectives could further strengthen the analysis. The article is clear and accessible, effectively engaging readers on a controversial topic with significant public interest. However, it could improve transparency by providing more detailed explanations of complex legal and economic issues. Overall, the article successfully informs and stimulates discussion on a critical policy issue with broad implications.

Accuracy

The article accurately presents the proposed remittance tax as part of a broader push by Republicans to address undocumented immigration. The claim about Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum's denunciation of the tax proposal is well-supported by her public statements. The details about the tax's impact on non-citizens and its exemption for US citizens are consistent with the proposed GOP tax bill. However, the article could benefit from more precise data on the number of people affected and the legal arguments regarding double taxation. Overall, the factual claims are largely verifiable and align with available sources, although some areas, such as the constitutional debate, could use further exploration.

Balance

The article provides a balanced view by presenting both the criticisms of the remittance tax from Mexican officials and the justifications from US proponents. It includes perspectives from Claudia Sheinbaum and Mark Krikorian, representing different sides of the debate. However, the article could improve by including more voices from affected immigrants and economic experts to provide a fuller picture of the potential impacts. While it addresses the political motivations behind the tax, it could delve deeper into the economic arguments for and against the proposal.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and presents information in a logical sequence, making it easy for readers to follow the narrative. The language is clear and neutral, effectively communicating the key points of the proposed tax and the surrounding debate. While the article is generally easy to understand, it could benefit from more detailed explanations of complex economic and legal concepts to ensure all readers fully grasp the implications.

Source quality

The article cites credible sources, including statements from Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and comments from Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies. These sources are relevant and authoritative on the topic. However, the article relies heavily on political figures and could enhance its credibility by incorporating more diverse sources, such as economic analysts or legal experts, to provide a broader perspective on the tax's implications.

Transparency

The article provides a clear account of the proposed tax and its potential impacts, but it lacks detailed explanations of the methodology behind some claims, such as the assertion of double taxation. While it mentions the political context of the tax proposal, it could be more transparent about the data sources used for economic figures and the legal basis for constitutional arguments. Greater transparency in these areas would enhance the article's credibility.