The article makes several factual claims about Evander Holyfield's impact on boxing and his fight history. However, it does not provide specific sources to verify these claims, and some details, like the exact nature of his training innovations, are not clearly substantiated.

The article primarily presents Joe Rogan's perspective on Holyfield's influence, without offering counterpoints or additional viewpoints from other experts or boxers. This creates a one-sided narrative that lacks depth and fairness.

The article is generally clear in its language and structure. However, it occasionally uses emotive language and lacks precise details, particularly in describing the outcomes of Holyfield's and Tyson's fights, which can confuse readers.

The article lacks citations and does not attribute any of its claims to verifiable sources. The only named source of opinion is Joe Rogan, whose expertise in boxing training is not well established compared to other potential experts.

The article does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest or affiliations. It also fails to clarify the context of the conversation or interview with Joe Rogan, leaving readers without a full understanding of the circumstances under which his comments were made.