Celtics irked by Magic’s physical play during NBA playoff series: ‘It’s not basketball’

New York Post - Apr 26th, 2025
Open on New York Post

The Boston Celtics find themselves in a physical and contentious playoff series against the Orlando Magic, who have drawn criticism for their aggressive play style. Despite holding a 2-1 lead, the Celtics are frustrated with what they consider overly physical and borderline dirty tactics by the Magic. Key players like Jaylen Brown and Kristaps Porzingis have voiced their displeasure, citing incidents that have led to injuries, including Brown's dislocated finger and Porzingis needing stitches after a brutal foul. The Celtics' finesse style is being challenged by the Magic's defensive prowess, leading to tensions and talk of potential fights as the series progresses.

This physicality harkens back to an old-school basketball era, contrasting with the Celtics' more finesse-driven approach. The implications of this series are significant, as it highlights the stark differences in play styles and refereeing challenges in managing physical games. The situation underscores the importance of player safety and fair play in high-stakes playoff games. As the series continues, the Celtics will need to adapt to the Magic's style if they hope to advance, setting the stage for a potentially explosive Game 4 where Orlando will aim to even the series.

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.6
Fair Story
Consider it well-founded

The article effectively captures the current dynamics of the Celtics-Magic playoff series, providing a detailed account of the Celtics' grievances regarding the physicality of the games. It is factually accurate and timely, with a clear presentation that engages readers. However, the story could benefit from a more balanced perspective by including viewpoints from the Orlando Magic and neutral parties like referees or NBA officials. While it appeals to sports fans and those following the NBA, its impact is primarily confined to the sports domain, with limited broader societal implications. Overall, the article succeeds in informing and engaging its target audience, though it could enhance its balance and transparency to provide a more comprehensive view of the situation.

RATING DETAILS

9
Accuracy

The story accurately reflects the current state of the Celtics-Magic playoff series, highlighting the Celtics’ frustration with the Magic’s physical and aggressive style of play. Key incidents of flagrant fouls and injuries to Celtics players are accurately reported, including Jayson Tatum's wrist injury, Kristaps Porzingis' forehead injury, and Jaylen Brown's dislocated finger. The story's claims about the Celtics' criticisms and the Magic's physical play are well-supported by multiple independent sources. However, some elements, such as the exact nature of the referees' control over the game, might be subjective and less verifiable.

7
Balance

The story primarily presents the perspective of the Boston Celtics, focusing on their grievances against the Orlando Magic's physical play. While it includes direct quotes from Celtics players like Jaylen Brown and Kristaps Porzingis, it does not equally represent the viewpoint of the Orlando Magic or provide commentary from neutral parties such as referees or NBA officials. This imbalance could lead readers to perceive a bias towards the Celtics' perspective.

8
Clarity

The article is well-structured and uses clear language, making it easy to follow. It logically presents the sequence of events and the players' reactions. However, the tone may come across as slightly sensational due to the focus on potential fights and injuries, which could affect the reader's perception of neutrality.

8
Source quality

The story draws from credible sources, including direct quotes from prominent players like Jaylen Brown and Kristaps Porzingis. These sources are authoritative given their direct involvement in the events described. However, the absence of quotes or responses from the Orlando Magic players or coaching staff slightly diminishes the overall source quality, as it limits the narrative to one side of the conflict.

6
Transparency

The article provides clear quotes and descriptions of incidents, which helps in understanding the basis of claims regarding the physicality of the games. However, it lacks transparency in terms of explaining the methodology behind assessing the physicality or the referees' decisions. There is also no disclosure of any potential conflicts of interest or biases from the players quoted.

Sources

  1. https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/44861538/after-game-3-loss-celtics-again-question-magic-physical-play
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mE_7DhmfTI
  3. https://www.si.com/nba/magic/news/boston-celtics-sound-off-on-orlando-magic-physicality-flagrants-fouls-there-might-be-a-fight-break-out-nba-playoffs-jaylen-brown
  4. https://deadspin.com/celtics-prepared-to-put-up-fight-vs-physical-magic-in-game-4/
  5. https://www.nbcsportsboston.com/nba/boston-celtics/live-updates-magic-highlights-score-game-3/705077/