"Can't come fast enough": Trump seeks "termination" of Fed Reserve Chair Powell

Salon - Apr 17th, 2025

President Donald Trump has openly criticized Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, calling for his dismissal in a recent post on Truth Social. Trump argues that Powell has mishandled interest rates and should reduce them to mitigate the economic impact of his tariff policies. This public confrontation comes after Powell warned that the tariffs could lead to increased inflation and slower economic growth during a speech in Chicago. Despite Trump's demands, Powell cannot be removed until his term ends in 2026, prompting speculation about potential market instability if Trump proceeds with actions against him.

The conflict highlights ongoing tensions between the White House and the Federal Reserve over monetary policy. Trump's insistence on controlling interest rates clashes with Powell's cautious approach, which stresses economic stability amid rising inflation. The situation raises concerns among politicians and financial experts about the potential repercussions of presidential interference with the Federal Reserve's independence. Senator Elizabeth Warren warned that any attempt to remove Powell could unsettle the financial markets, further complicating the economic landscape Trump seeks to navigate with his tariff plans.

Donald Trump Federal Reserve Inflation Interest Rates Economic Policy Tariffs Jerome Powell

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.0

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article effectively covers a timely and significant topic involving President Trump's criticism of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and the broader economic implications of tariffs and interest rates. It provides a balanced perspective by including viewpoints from key figures like Trump, Powell, and Senator Warren. The piece is clear and accessible, making it easy for readers to follow the narrative. However, the article could improve in source quality and transparency by providing more direct attributions and context for the claims made. Overall, it serves as a solid piece of journalism that addresses an important issue with potential public impact.

Accuracy

The article accurately reports on President Trump's criticism of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and his call for lower interest rates. It correctly states Trump's use of social media to express his discontent and his desire for Powell's removal. The factual claims about Powell's term ending in 2026 and the legal ambiguity surrounding his potential removal are precise. However, the article could benefit from more explicit sourcing for Powell's exact quotes and Trump's statements to ensure comprehensive verifiability.

Balance

The article presents multiple perspectives, including Trump's viewpoint and Powell's warnings about the economic impacts of tariffs. It also includes a counterpoint from Senator Elizabeth Warren, offering a political perspective on the potential consequences of firing Powell. However, the article could improve by incorporating more diverse economic analyses or opinions from financial experts to provide a fuller picture of the implications of the interest rate and tariff policies.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and clearly presents the sequence of events and differing viewpoints. The language is straightforward, making it easy for readers to follow the narrative. However, the piece could improve by providing more background information on the economic context and the implications of the tariffs and interest rate changes to enhance reader understanding.

Source quality

The article references statements from high-profile individuals like Trump and Powell, which are credible sources for the claims made. However, it lacks direct attribution to primary sources or detailed citations for the quotes and assertions. Including references to official reports or verified social media posts would enhance the reliability and credibility of the information presented.

Transparency

While the article provides a clear narrative of the events, it lacks explicit transparency regarding its sources and the methodology behind the claims. There is no disclosure of potential conflicts of interest or the basis for the economic assertions made by Powell. Greater transparency about the sources of information and the context of the statements would improve the article's credibility.