California reports sharp rise in Valley fever cases for first three months of 2025

Los Angeles Times - Apr 25th, 2025
Open on Los Angeles Times

California is experiencing a significant increase in Valley fever cases, with 3,123 reported in the first quarter of the year, double the 10-year average for this period. The disease, caused by inhaling spores of the coccidioides fungus, thrives in dry and dusty conditions. The recent surge is attributed to a pattern of drought followed by wet winters and dry summers. Key areas affected include Monterey, where cases have skyrocketed. Health officials are working to understand the disease's increasing severity and potential resistance to antifungal treatments.

Valley fever poses a challenge due to its symptoms resembling those of COVID-19 or the flu, complicating diagnosis and treatment. High-risk groups include construction workers, firefighters, and archaeologists in arid regions. Efforts to mitigate the disease at events like the Lightning in a Bottle festival include dust control measures. The rise in cases has prompted a statewide response involving multiple health agencies and research institutions to explore factors like soil disturbance and potential drug resistance, though funding and attention have historically focused on other public health threats.

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.8
Fair Story
Consider it well-founded

The news story provides a well-rounded and largely accurate account of the increasing cases of Valley fever in California. It effectively uses credible sources and clear language to explain the disease and its contributing factors. However, it could benefit from greater transparency regarding data sources and a broader range of perspectives to enhance balance. While it successfully highlights a pressing public health issue, adding more controversial or debated aspects could deepen reader engagement and provoke further discussion. Overall, the article is informative, timely, and relevant to public interest, with room for improvement in source transparency and the inclusion of diverse viewpoints.

RATING DETAILS

8
Accuracy

The article presents a generally accurate depiction of the rise in Valley fever cases in California. The reported figures, such as the 3,123 cases in the first quarter of 2025, align with typical data trends and are supported by statements from credible sources like state health officials. The description of the disease's symptoms and its comparison to COVID-19 and flu are consistent with medical literature. However, the article could benefit from more precise citations or links to the data sources for the case numbers and trends to strengthen its accuracy further.

7
Balance

The article provides a balanced overview of the factors contributing to the rise in Valley fever cases, including environmental and human activities. It includes perspectives from health officials and experts, which adds depth. However, it could enhance balance by incorporating more viewpoints, such as those from affected individuals or community leaders in high-risk areas, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the impact and responses at the community level.

9
Clarity

The article is well-written, with clear language and a logical structure that makes the complex topic of Valley fever accessible to a general audience. It effectively explains the disease, its symptoms, and the factors contributing to its spread. The use of quotes and specific examples, such as the mention of the music festival, adds clarity and helps illustrate key points.

8
Source quality

The article relies on credible sources, including health officials and experts from reputable institutions like UC Davis. The inclusion of direct quotes from these sources adds to the reliability of the information. However, the article could improve by explicitly naming the data sources or providing links to official reports or studies, which would enhance the transparency and trustworthiness of the information presented.

7
Transparency

The article is transparent in its presentation of facts and quotes from experts, which helps readers understand the basis of its claims. However, it lacks detailed explanations of the methodologies used to gather data on Valley fever cases, such as how cases are reported and verified. Providing this context would improve transparency and help readers assess the reliability of the information.

Sources

  1. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/Pages/ValleyFeverDataPublications.aspx
  2. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/pages/Coccidioidomycosis.aspx
  3. https://publichealth.berkeley.edu/news-media/research-highlights/longer-drier-summers-extend-valley-fever-transmission
  4. https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2024-12-27/valley-fever-cases-spike-in-california
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11383451/