Boox's new Go 7 E Ink tablets support handwriting with a $46 stylus

Engadget - Apr 25th, 2025

Boox has introduced the Go 7 and Go Color 7 (Gen II) ereaders, featuring a Kindle Oasis-like design combined with Android 13. These devices, equipped with E Ink technology, support handwriting through a $46 stylus and offer access to the Google Play Store, allowing users to install various reading and note-taking apps. The Go Color 7 utilizes E Ink Kaleido 3 technology for color displays, while the Go 7 features a monochrome Carta 1300 display. Both devices weigh 195g and provide 4GB RAM, 64GB of internal storage, and microSD support.

The introduction of these ereaders signifies a strategic move by Boox to capture the market left by the discontinuation of the Kindle Oasis. With their Android-based platform, Boox's devices offer greater flexibility compared to competitors like Kobo and Kindle. The ability to use multiple ebook storefronts and apps could significantly appeal to tech-savvy readers seeking a customizable reading experience. The stylus, with its 4,096 pressure levels, also enhances the usability of these devices for note-taking enthusiasts. Despite the added cost for the stylus, the offerings reflect Boox's attempt to differentiate itself in a competitive ereader market.

Play Store Kindle Oasis Boox E Ink Technology Go 7 Ereaders Android 13 E Ink Kaleido 3 Stylus

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.0

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides a detailed overview of Boox's new e-reader offerings, focusing on their features and specifications. It is generally accurate in its descriptions of the devices' technology and capabilities, though some claims, such as the Android version and pricing, lack verification. The article is clear and well-structured, making it accessible to a broad audience, but it could benefit from more balanced coverage and transparency in sourcing. While it is timely and relevant to tech enthusiasts, its impact is primarily limited to consumer decision-making. Overall, the article serves as a useful resource for those interested in the latest developments in e-reader technology, though it could be strengthened by addressing the noted gaps in accuracy and balance.

Accuracy

The article presents several factual claims about Boox's new ereaders, the Go 7 and Go Color 7. It accurately describes the use of E Ink Kaleido 3 technology in the Go Color 7 and Carta 1300 in the Go 7, as confirmed by multiple sources. However, the claim of Android 13 on the Go Color 7 is inconsistent with sources listing Android 12. Additionally, the pricing and availability details for both models are not corroborated by available sources, which affects the overall accuracy score. The article's mention of the Kindle Oasis-like form factor and stylus support are mostly accurate, though specific details about the stylus's price and features are not verified.

Balance

The article focuses primarily on the features and specifications of the Boox devices, with limited discussion of competing products. While it mentions competitors like the Kindle and Kobo lines, it does not provide a detailed comparison or explore potential drawbacks of the Boox devices. This could lead to a perceived bias towards Boox by not fully representing alternative perspectives or potential downsides. The article could benefit from a more balanced view by including user reviews or expert opinions on the devices' performance compared to competitors.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, providing a logical flow of information about the new Boox devices. It uses straightforward language to describe the technical specifications and features, making it accessible to readers with varying levels of technical expertise. The use of comparisons to well-known products like the Kindle Oasis helps to contextualize the information. However, some technical terms, such as 'E Ink Kaleido 3' and 'Carta 1300,' may require further explanation for readers unfamiliar with e-reader technology.

Source quality

The article does not explicitly cite its sources, which makes it difficult to assess the credibility and reliability of the information presented. While the factual claims align with some product listings and specifications available online, the lack of direct attribution to authoritative sources such as official Boox announcements or expert reviews limits the article's source quality. Including references to specific sources or industry experts would enhance the credibility of the information provided.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency regarding the basis for its claims, as it does not disclose the sources of its information or the methodology used to gather it. This omission makes it challenging for readers to assess the reliability of the content or understand the context behind the claims. Additionally, there is no discussion of potential conflicts of interest or the author's background, which could impact impartiality. Greater transparency in sourcing and methodology would improve the article's trustworthiness.