Body found in hunt for two British hikers missing in Italian Alps | CNN

CNN - Jan 8th, 2025
Open on CNN

Rescue crews in the Italian Alps have discovered the body of a British hiker, Aziz Ziriat, 36, buried in snow while continuing to search for his missing friend, Sam Harris, 35. The men, both experienced hikers, had been missing since January 1 after embarking on a New Year’s Day trek in the Adamello range near Trento. Delayed alerts and adverse weather conditions, including snowfall and avalanche risks, hindered initial search efforts. However, on Wednesday, improvements in weather allowed a helicopter to fly over the area, leading to the discovery of their equipment and Ziriat's body at their last known location. The search for Harris is ongoing, with rescue teams using phone recordings to aid their efforts.

The missing hikers' situation highlights the dangers of alpine hiking during winter, particularly in areas prone to severe weather and avalanches. The Adamello range, known for its challenging terrain and high peaks like Mt. Adamello, straddles the Lombardy and Trentino-Alto Adige regions. The incident underscores the importance of timely alerts and the risks associated with going off-grid in remote areas. This tragedy also raises concerns about safety measures and communication protocols for hikers in isolated regions. The ongoing search reflects both the perilous nature of the environment and the determination of rescue services to locate the missing hiker.

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8
Fair Story
Consider it well-founded

The article provides a concise report of a tragic incident involving British hikers in the Italian Alps. It excels in clarity, presenting the facts in a straightforward manner, although it could benefit from more transparency regarding the sources and methodologies used in the search efforts. The article's accuracy is generally solid, with clear details about the timeline of the hikers' disappearance and the search challenges faced by rescue crews. However, it lacks a balanced perspective by not including official statements from local authorities or rescue teams. The source quality is somewhat limited as it relies primarily on the statements from relatives and British media without verifying these accounts through direct quotes or additional authoritative sources.

RATING DETAILS

8
Accuracy

The article is largely accurate, detailing the timeline of events with specific dates and descriptions of the search efforts. It accurately reports the delay in the alert to rescue services and the weather conditions that hampered initial search efforts. However, it would benefit from more specific data about the search operations, such as the names of the rescue organizations involved and the exact location where the body was found. The article mentions the hikers' experience and their tendency to go 'off the grid,' but these claims are not supported by direct quotes or specific evidence, necessitating a slight deduction in score for the lack of detailed sourcing.

6
Balance

While the article provides a narrative of the events from the perspective of the hikers' relatives, it lacks balance by not including perspectives from local officials or rescue teams. The reliance on quotes from family members and friends might introduce a bias, as it primarily focuses on the hikers' experience and intentions without addressing potential risks or criticisms of their actions. The article could have improved its balance by incorporating statements from Italian authorities or rescue services, offering a more comprehensive view of the situation and acknowledging the challenges faced by the search teams.

9
Clarity

The article is well-structured and clear, presenting the information in a logical sequence that is easy to follow. It provides a straightforward account of the timeline from the hikers' departure to the discovery of one of their bodies. The language is simple and professional, avoiding emotive language that could detract from the factual reporting. However, the article could benefit from clearer attribution of quotes and sources to avoid any potential confusion about the origin of information. Overall, the clarity of the article is strong, with a minor deduction for the lack of explicit source attributions.

5
Source quality

The article's source quality is limited, as it primarily relies on quotes from British media and the hikers' relatives. There is no direct attribution to Italian rescue services beyond the general statement of their efforts. The absence of direct quotes or detailed information from official sources, such as local authorities or rescue team leaders, weakens the article's credibility. Additionally, it does not specify which British media outlets provided the quotes, making it difficult to assess the reliability of these sources. Including statements from official organizations or independent experts would have strengthened the article's source quality.

6
Transparency

The article provides a basic narrative of the incident but lacks transparency regarding the sources of its information and the methodologies used in the search efforts. It does not disclose how the information was gathered, whether through interviews, press releases, or other means. Additionally, it fails to mention any affiliations or potential conflicts of interest that might influence the reporting. Greater transparency could be achieved by detailing the communication channels used with Italian rescue services and disclosing any limitations in the information available. The inclusion of specific methodologies used during the search would also enhance transparency.