Bluesky is getting blue checkmarks and an official verification system

Engadget - Apr 21st, 2025

Bluesky, the burgeoning social media platform, has announced the adoption of an official verification system, marking a significant shift from its previous stance against centralized verification. The platform will now issue blue checkmarks to accounts deemed 'authentic and notable,' addressing criticisms of its prior domain-based verification system. This change comes as Bluesky has gained popularity and attracted high-profile users, such as former President Barack Obama, whose presence on the platform highlighted the need for a more robust verification process. The new system will also allow 'trusted organizations' to verify users, with The New York Times being named as one such entity.

The move signifies Bluesky's response to growing concerns about impersonation and the complexities of their earlier verification methods. By enabling trusted organizations to grant blue checks, Bluesky aims to enhance authenticity and trust on the platform. However, the company has not yet detailed the criteria for verification or the process for selecting trusted organizations, though it has stated intentions to review third-party verifications for authenticity. While Bluesky will not initially accept direct applications for verification, it plans to introduce a request form for notable accounts as the feature becomes more stable. This development highlights Bluesky's ongoing evolution as it seeks to balance user demands for authenticity with its foundational principles.

Social Media Barack Obama The New York Times Bluesky Verification System Impersonation Trusted Organizations

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.0

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a timely and relevant overview of Bluesky's new verification system, highlighting its significance in the context of social media authenticity. It accurately reports the main developments and is clear and readable, making it accessible to a broad audience. However, the article could benefit from greater transparency regarding its sources and methodology, as well as more balanced coverage that includes diverse perspectives and expert analysis. While the article engages with a topic of public interest, its potential impact and controversy could be enhanced by exploring the implications and criticisms of the new system in more depth. Overall, the article is informative and well-structured, but additional context and analysis would strengthen its quality and reliability.

Accuracy

The article accurately reports that Bluesky is implementing a verification system, which includes blue checkmarks for 'authentic and notable' accounts. This claim is consistent with Bluesky's official announcements. However, the article lacks specifics on the criteria for verification, which are not clearly defined in the available sources. The mention of trusted organizations verifying users is accurate, with The New York Times cited as an example. The claim about the absence of a direct application process initially aligns with Bluesky's statement that applications will not be accepted during the initial phase. Overall, the article is truthful and precise, but it would benefit from more detailed information on the verification criteria and the list of trusted organizations.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on Bluesky's decision to implement a verification system, presenting it as a significant shift from their previous stance. It mentions the critiques of the previous domain-based system, providing a balanced view of the reasons for the change. However, the article could have included perspectives from users or experts on the potential implications of this new system. The lack of opposing viewpoints or potential criticisms of the new system suggests a slight imbalance in the presentation. Including more diverse opinions would enhance the article's balance.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and clearly presents the key points regarding Bluesky's new verification system. The language is straightforward and easy to understand, making the information accessible to a general audience. The logical flow of the article helps readers follow the narrative from the introduction of the system to its potential implications. However, the article could improve clarity by providing more detailed explanations of the verification criteria and the role of trusted organizations. Overall, the article effectively communicates its main points in a clear and concise manner.

Source quality

The article appears to rely on official statements from Bluesky as its primary source, which is credible and authoritative. However, it does not cite any external experts or independent sources to provide additional context or analysis. The reliance on a single source limits the depth of the reporting and may affect the perceived impartiality. Including a variety of sources, such as industry experts or user testimonials, would strengthen the article's credibility and provide a more comprehensive view of the situation.

Transparency

The article provides a clear explanation of Bluesky's new verification system and mentions the company's previous resistance to centralized verification. However, it lacks transparency regarding the methodology used to gather information and does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest. The article would benefit from more explicit disclosure of the sources of information and any affiliations that could impact the reporting. Greater transparency would enhance the reader's understanding of the basis for the claims made in the article.