The article presents several factual claims that are mostly consistent with known information about cyber threats, particularly credential stuffing and the use of stolen credentials. However, the existence and specific capabilities of the 'Atlantis AIO' as an automatic hacking machine using millions of stolen passwords require further verification. The claim about billions of compromised passwords aligns with general cybersecurity reports, but the specific figure of 85 million passwords currently in use should be verified with credible sources. The mention of session cookies being used to bypass two-factor authentication (2FA) is plausible, but needs more detailed evidence or expert validation to support its accuracy.

The article primarily focuses on the threat posed by the Atlantis AIO tool and the broader issue of credential stuffing. While it effectively highlights the dangers to individual and corporate security, it lacks a balanced perspective by not including viewpoints from cybersecurity experts or organizations that might offer countermeasures or differing opinions on the severity of the threat. Additionally, the article could benefit from including information on how businesses and individuals are successfully mitigating these risks, which would provide a more rounded view of the issue.

The article is generally clear and well-structured, making it easy to follow the main points and understand the potential threats posed by credential stuffing and tools like Atlantis AIO. The language is straightforward, and the use of specific examples, such as the targeting of email providers and streaming services, helps illustrate the article's claims. However, the article could improve clarity by providing more background information on technical terms like 'credential stuffing' and 'session cookies' for readers who may not be familiar with cybersecurity concepts.

The article references a report from Abnormal Security, which suggests some level of source credibility. However, it lacks direct quotes or detailed information from the report itself, making it difficult to assess the reliability of the claims. The absence of additional sources, such as cybersecurity experts or other industry reports, reduces the overall source quality. Including a variety of authoritative sources would enhance the article's credibility and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the topic.

The article does not clearly disclose the methodology behind its claims, particularly regarding the number of compromised passwords and the capabilities of Atlantis AIO. There is a lack of transparency in how the information was obtained and the potential conflicts of interest that may exist. The article would benefit from a clearer explanation of the basis for its claims and any limitations or uncertainties associated with the data presented.