As Ohio State University gears up for Tennessee, M’s on campus are still crossed out from Michigan game. Here’s why.

Cleveland - Dec 19th, 2024

The Ohio State vs. Michigan football rivalry is deeply ingrained in the culture at Ohio State University, with traditions such as crossing out the letter 'M' on signs with red tape during Michigan Week. This practice is not officially endorsed by the university but is enthusiastically adopted by students and faculty, illustrating the intensity of the rivalry. Despite Ohio State facing other significant opponents like Tennessee in the College Football Playoff, the taping tradition remains exclusive to the Michigan rivalry due to its historical significance and emotional impact on the community.

Ohio State

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.4

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides an engaging look into the Ohio State vs. Michigan football rivalry, particularly the tradition of taping over 'M's on campus. It offers anecdotal insights and captures the cultural intensity of the rivalry, although it could benefit from a more thorough examination of sources and a clearer presentation.

Accuracy

The article is generally accurate in describing the Ohio State vs. Michigan rivalry and the tradition of taping over 'M's. However, it lacks precise details on the origin of the tradition and only mentions that it appeared on social media in 2011. Additional historical context or corroboration would enhance accuracy.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on the Ohio State perspective and does not offer viewpoints from Michigan fans or neutral observers. Including a range of perspectives would provide a more balanced view of the rivalry.

Clarity

The article is mostly clear and engaging, though it sometimes meanders with personal anecdotes. A more structured approach could improve readability and ensure that key points are more prominently highlighted.

Source quality

The article cites Nathan Hart of the Columbus Dispatch and Tim Bielik of cleveland.com but does not provide direct quotes or links to their work. The lack of detailed sourcing reduces the article's credibility.

Transparency

While the article provides anecdotal evidence and includes statements from students, it does not disclose potential biases or conflicts of interest, such as the author's affiliations or potential fan loyalties.