Are We Suddenly Close To A Recession? Here's What The Data Actually Shows.

Forbes - Mar 8th, 2025

As President Donald Trump's trade war continues to impact consumer confidence and financial markets, concerns about a potential recession are resurfacing. The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta's GDPNow model forecasts a contraction in U.S. economic output by an annualized rate of -2.4% in the first quarter of 2025, marking the worst performance since the pandemic's peak in 2020. This has raised alarms about a possible recession, with consumer sentiment plummeting to a 15-month low and layoff announcements reaching a 4.5-year high. Economists from Goldman Sachs and Yardeni Research have increased their recession odds, citing Trump's economic strategies as a significant risk.

Despite these warnings, there is evidence suggesting that a recession is not guaranteed. Historical data indicates that previous predictions of a downturn were followed by periods of economic growth. Furthermore, the GDPNow model's forecast may be overly pessimistic, with discrepancies noted in its accounting of certain factors like gold imports. Critics argue that U.S. policies are becoming less business-friendly, potentially impacting growth in North America. Nevertheless, the labor market remains relatively strong, with a stable unemployment rate and continued job creation, albeit at a slower pace.

Donald Trump Tariffs Trade War Goldman Sachs Federal Reserve Bank Of Atlanta Recession Gdp Now Model Consumer Confidence Economic Policies

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.6

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a comprehensive overview of the potential for a recession, supported by credible sources and a range of economic indicators. It effectively balances the presentation of risks and counterarguments, though it could benefit from a wider array of expert opinions to enhance balance and transparency. The use of reputable sources like the Federal Reserve and Goldman Sachs lends credibility, but more direct citations would strengthen source attribution. While the article is timely and addresses topics of significant public interest, its engagement and impact could be improved with more dynamic presentation elements and deeper analysis of policy implications. Overall, the story is informative and relevant, though it could enhance clarity and reader engagement with additional context and explanation of technical terms.

Accuracy

The article presents several factual claims that are mostly supported by credible sources, such as the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta's GDPNow model and Goldman Sachs' economic forecasts. However, some claims, such as the specific percentage changes in recession odds and GDP growth forecasts, require verification from primary sources like the Atlanta Fed and Goldman Sachs. The article accurately describes the technical definition of a recession but could benefit from more precise data on current economic indicators like consumer sentiment and stock market performance to enhance its accuracy.

Balance

The article attempts to provide a balanced view by presenting both the risks of a recession and arguments against its imminence. It cites various economic models and forecasts, highlighting differing opinions from institutions like Goldman Sachs and the New York Fed. However, the article could improve balance by including more perspectives from independent economists or analysts not directly tied to the entities mentioned. This would help mitigate any perceived bias towards the economic policies of the Trump administration.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, with a logical flow from the introduction of potential recession indicators to the analysis of economic forecasts. The language is accessible, though some technical terms related to economic models may require further explanation for general readers. The tone remains neutral, focusing on presenting facts and interpretations without overt sensationalism, which aids in reader comprehension.

Source quality

The article relies on reputable sources such as the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Goldman Sachs, and the National Bureau of Economic Research, which are authoritative in economic analysis. These sources enhance the article's credibility. However, the article would benefit from more direct citations or links to these institutions' reports to strengthen source attribution. The inclusion of quotes from key economic officials adds to its reliability, though it could include a wider range of expert opinions.

Transparency

The article provides some context for its claims, such as the historical backdrop of past recessions, but lacks detailed explanations of the methodologies behind the economic models cited. There is minimal disclosure of potential conflicts of interest, particularly in the interpretations of economic data that could be influenced by political biases. Greater transparency about the sources of economic forecasts and the potential biases of quoted officials would improve the article's transparency.