Anker’s MagSafe-friendly 622 power bank is down to just $23

The Verge - Apr 21st, 2025

Anker's 622 Magnetic Battery (MagGo), a last-generation MagSafe-compatible charger, is now available for $22.99 during Woot's Anker Power Mania sale until April 25th. Although not as fast as the newer 6,600mAh Qi2 power bank, the 5,000mAh Anker 622 still delivers 7.5 watts of power, enough to charge an iPhone 16 or 16 Pro to about 80% in a couple of hours. It also includes a foldable kickstand for hands-free use and a USB-C port for simultaneous charging of the power bank and phone.

The sale highlights the enduring value of the Anker 622 MagGo amidst newer, more expensive alternatives. This deal is particularly significant for users seeking reliable charging solutions without breaking the bank. The broader sale also includes discounts on other tech accessories like the Nothing Ear (a) earbuds and the second-gen Theragun Mini, showcasing Woot's commitment to offering value across various tech needs. Such sales events highlight the importance of competitive pricing in consumer electronics and the ongoing demand for affordable, high-quality tech accessories.

Discount Consumer Electronics Mag Safe Anker 622 Magnetic Battery Woot Power Mania Sale Qi2 Compatible Chargers

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a clear and timely overview of current sales on tech accessories, particularly focusing on Anker's 622 Magnetic Battery. It is factually accurate and presents relevant information for consumers interested in deals. However, the lack of explicit source attribution and transparency about the basis for claims slightly undermines its credibility. While the article effectively engages a niche audience interested in tech deals, it lacks broader public interest or impact. Its straightforward and neutral tone makes it accessible, though it could benefit from a more balanced perspective by including potential drawbacks or comparisons with other products. Overall, it serves its purpose as a consumer-focused piece but could be enhanced by greater transparency and source quality.

Accuracy

The article presents factual information about Anker's 622 Magnetic Battery and its features, such as its 5000mAh capacity, 7.5W wireless charging capability, and USB-C passthrough charging. These details align with product specifications available from credible sources. The sale price of $22.99 is accurately reported as a significant discount, though verifying the claim that it is $3 shy of the best price to date would strengthen the article's accuracy. The performance claim about charging an iPhone to 80% is plausible but could benefit from additional verification across different models.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on the benefits of the Anker 622 Magnetic Battery and other products on sale, presenting a favorable view of the deals without discussing potential drawbacks or limitations. This creates a slight imbalance, as readers are not informed about any possible disadvantages of the products. Including a more varied perspective, such as user reviews or comparisons with competitors, would enhance balance.

Clarity

The article is clear and straightforward, using accessible language to describe the features and benefits of the products. The structure is logical, with a focus on key points like pricing and functionality. However, the inclusion of multiple products in a single piece without clear transitions can slightly disrupt the flow, making it harder for readers to follow the main narrative.

Source quality

The article does not explicitly cite sources, which affects the perceived reliability of the information. It likely draws from product specifications and sale announcements, but the lack of direct attribution to authoritative sources such as Anker's official website or reputable retailers diminishes the article's credibility. Providing clear source references would improve the assessment of source quality.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency regarding the basis for its claims and the methodology used to determine the sale's significance. It does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest, such as affiliations with the retailers mentioned. Greater transparency about the sources of information and any affiliations would help readers assess the impartiality of the content.