"Americans are going to see consequences": Pence breaks with Trump on tariffs, deportations

Salon - May 6th, 2025

Former Vice President Mike Pence broke his relative silence on Donald Trump by criticizing the former president's tariff policies in a recent CNN interview. Pence argued that Trump's broad-based tariffs could lead to inflation and harm the American economy, affecting everything from consumer goods to the overall economic stability. He expressed concern over the indiscriminate nature of these tariffs, which apply equally to allies and adversaries, suggesting that this approach is detrimental to American interests. Pence also voiced apprehensions about potential price shocks and shortages that may impact American consumers.

In addition to his economic critiques, Pence touched upon Trump's immigration policies, emphasizing the importance of constitutional protections for all individuals in the U.S., not just citizens. He also criticized Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s leadership of Health and Human Services, citing concerns over Kennedy's history of vaccine skepticism and his stance on abortion. Pence stressed the need for leaders who build public confidence in vaccines, highlighting the significance of this issue for future generations. These comments mark a rare public dissent from Pence, illustrating ongoing tensions within the Republican Party regarding Trump's legacy and policy directions.

Donald Trump Tariffs Immigration Policy Vaccine Skepticism Mike Pence U.S. Economy Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

4.4

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article addresses timely and relevant political issues, such as economic policies and public health, which are of significant public interest. However, its overall quality is undermined by factual inaccuracies, particularly the misattribution of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as an HHS official, and a lack of balance and transparency. The absence of direct sourcing and diverse perspectives limits the article's reliability and potential impact. While the article is generally readable, its informal tone and editorialized language affect its perceived professionalism. To improve its quality, the article would benefit from more rigorous sourcing, balanced presentation, and a clearer structure.

Accuracy

The article presents several claims that require verification, such as Pence's criticism of Trump's tariff policy and his comments on the deportation program. The statement about Pence's silence post-January 6 is partially supported by other sources, indicating some accuracy. However, the mention of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as the HHS Secretary is factually incorrect, which significantly affects the story's accuracy. The lack of direct sourcing for specific quotes also diminishes the precision and verifiability of the claims.

Balance

The story appears to focus heavily on criticizing Trump and his policies through Pence's statements, without offering much context or counterarguments from other perspectives. There is a noticeable lack of balance, as the article does not provide insights from Trump or his supporters to counter or contextualize Pence's criticisms. This one-sided approach can lead to perceived bias and an incomplete representation of the issue.

Clarity

The language used in the article is generally clear, but the structure could be improved for better logical flow. The tone is somewhat informal and editorialized, which can affect the neutrality of the piece. While the article is mostly understandable, the lack of direct sourcing and the presence of inaccuracies can hinder full comprehension.

Source quality

The article lacks direct attribution to primary sources, such as the CNN interview with Pence, which undermines the reliability of the information presented. The misattribution of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as the HHS Secretary further questions the credibility of the sources used. The absence of a variety of authoritative sources and potential conflicts of interest are not addressed, impacting the article's overall source quality.

Transparency

The article does not clearly disclose the sources of its claims or provide sufficient context for the statements made. There is no explanation of the methodology used to gather information, nor are any potential conflicts of interest revealed. This lack of transparency makes it difficult for readers to assess the impartiality and basis of the claims presented.

Sources

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMBY68wX8F8