The story accurately identifies key factual elements regarding the geopolitical situation between Ethiopia and Eritrea. It correctly states that Assab is located in Eritrea and not Ethiopia, as falsely claimed in altered social media posts. The article also accurately describes Ethiopia's historical access to the Red Sea through Assab before Eritrea's independence in 1993. Additionally, the story references the Ethiopian Prime Minister's statement denying any intention to invade Eritrea, aligning with recorded statements. The factual claims are well-supported by reliable sources, such as AFP Fact Check, which conducted reverse image searches to verify the map's authenticity. The only minor area for improvement could be more detailed sourcing of the Prime Minister's statement.

The article presents a balanced view of the situation by addressing both the false claims circulating on social media and the official stance of the Ethiopian government. It highlights the altered map and the geopolitical context without showing favoritism towards any party. However, the story could have included more perspectives, such as reactions from Eritrean officials or international observers, to provide a fuller picture of the regional dynamics. By focusing primarily on the factual correction of the map and Ethiopia's position, the article maintains a neutral tone but could benefit from a broader range of viewpoints.

The article is well-structured and uses clear, concise language to communicate the key points. It logically progresses from the false social media claims to the factual corrections and geopolitical context. The use of specific examples, such as the altered map and the Ethiopian Prime Minister's statement, aids in reader comprehension. The article effectively avoids jargon and maintains a neutral tone, making it accessible to a general audience. The clarity of the article is further enhanced by its straightforward presentation of facts and logical flow of information.

The story relies on credible sources, such as AFP Fact Check, which is known for its rigorous verification processes. The use of reverse image searches and archival resources strengthens the reliability of the information presented. The article also references historical context and official statements, lending further credibility to its claims. However, the story could enhance its source quality by including direct quotes from Ethiopian or Eritrean officials or experts in African geopolitics to provide authoritative insights. Overall, the reliance on reputable sources and fact-checking organizations contributes to the story's high source quality score.

The article is transparent in its methodology by explaining how the map was verified and the sources used to debunk the false claims. It clearly outlines the steps taken by AFP Fact Check to authenticate the map's original version, providing readers with insight into the verification process. However, the article could improve transparency by disclosing any potential biases or limitations in the sources used, such as the lack of direct input from Eritrean authorities. Despite this, the article's clarity in presenting its fact-checking process and the basis for its claims enhances its transparency.