3 Signs That You’re Addicted To ‘Drama Bonding’ — By A Psychologist

Forbes - Apr 2nd, 2025

The concept of 'drama bonding,' introduced by psychology professor Sam Vaknin, refers to relationships characterized by mutual emotional turmoil rather than genuine intimacy. Unlike trauma bonding, drama bonding often involves both parties contributing to cycles of chaos. Mental health educator Lindsay Braman highlights that individuals accustomed to high-conflict environments may find emotional upheaval familiar and even comforting. This can lead to a reliance on emotional highs and lows, where stability feels unnatural and unsettling. Recognizing these patterns is the first step toward shifting relational dynamics.

The story underscores the psychological and physiological reasons behind drama bonding, explaining how it often stems from a need for validation and attention. Dr. Scott Lyons, in his book 'Addicted to Drama,' elaborates on how chaotic moments provide a temporary sense of aliveness and self-worth. Neuroscience research also reveals how the brain becomes conditioned to seek emotional highs associated with turmoil. To break free from this cycle, individuals are encouraged to acknowledge these patterns, seek professional help, and cultivate healthier relationships. Techniques such as mindfulness and nervous system regulation can aid in finding fulfillment in stability, promoting long-term well-being.

Mental Health Drama Bonding Sam Vaknin Lindsay Braman Emotional Chaos Trauma Reenactment Scott Lyons Nervous System

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.2

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides an insightful exploration of drama bonding, a relevant and intriguing topic in the field of psychology. It effectively explains complex concepts in an accessible manner, making it engaging and informative for a broad audience. However, the article could benefit from enhanced accuracy and transparency by including direct citations and a wider range of expert opinions. While it addresses a significant public interest topic, its impact is more likely to be personal rather than societal. Overall, the story is a well-written piece that could be strengthened with more rigorous sourcing and balanced perspectives.

Accuracy

The article presents several claims that are generally aligned with psychological concepts, such as drama bonding and trauma reenactment. However, it attributes the term 'drama bonding' to Sam Vaknin without clear evidence or citation, which requires verification. The discussion on neurological conditioning involving the amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex is plausible but lacks direct citations to specific studies, which is necessary for full verification. Overall, while the claims are consistent with existing psychological theories, the story could benefit from more precise sourcing to enhance its factual accuracy.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on the psychological aspects of drama bonding and its effects on individuals. It provides a detailed explanation of the phenomenon from the perspective of those who experience it, but it does not explore other viewpoints, such as those of mental health professionals who may offer different interpretations or solutions. Additionally, the article could include perspectives on how drama bonding affects relationships from a broader societal or relational context, which would provide a more balanced view.

Clarity

The article is well-written and easy to follow, with clear explanations of complex psychological concepts. It uses accessible language and provides practical examples to illustrate its points. The structure is logical, guiding the reader through the phenomenon of drama bonding, its causes, and potential solutions. However, the clarity could be improved by integrating more explicit references to studies or expert opinions.

Source quality

The article references experts like Sam Vaknin and Lindsay Braman, which suggests some level of authority. However, it does not provide direct citations or links to their work, which limits the ability to verify the claims independently. The lack of varied sources, such as academic studies or additional expert opinions, diminishes the article's overall reliability and authority.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in terms of sourcing and methodology. It does not disclose how the information was gathered or provide links to studies or expert interviews. While it explains the concept of drama bonding, it does not clarify the basis for its claims or acknowledge any potential conflicts of interest. Greater transparency would enhance the reader's trust in the information presented.