“취약점 논의 220% 늘었다”··· SAP 시스템 공격 시도 증가 중

Onapsis, a company specializing in ERP security, revealed at the Black Hat Europe 2024 conference that hacking attempts on SAP's ERP systems have surged since 2020. SAP systems are used by 87% of the Global 2000 companies and handle 77% of global transaction revenue, making them prime targets for cybercriminals. Onapsis, in partnership with Flashpoint, analyzed cybercriminal activities and identified various groups targeting SAP systems, including ransomware groups and cyber espionage organizations. The analysis highlighted vulnerabilities such as RECON and authorization bypass in SAP systems, with attacks exploiting unpatched vulnerabilities. The company stressed the importance for enterprises to prioritize regular patch management and vulnerability assessments to mitigate these threats.
RATING
The article provides an in-depth analysis of the cybersecurity threats targeting SAP systems, based on findings from Onapsis and Flashpoint. However, it lacks explicit citations and source attribution, which affects its overall credibility. While it covers multiple viewpoints on the issue, there is room for improvement in terms of clarity and transparency.
RATING DETAILS
The article presents factual information about cybersecurity threats to SAP systems, supported by specific examples and data. However, it lacks explicit references to primary sources or reports, which would strengthen its accuracy.
The article includes multiple perspectives on the cybersecurity threats, discussing insights from various experts and organizations. It appears to present a balanced view without evident bias.
The article contains technical jargon and complex sentence structures, which may hinder understanding for a general audience. Improved organization and simplification of language would enhance clarity.
While the article mentions reputable organizations like Onapsis and Flashpoint, it does not provide direct citations or detailed source information. This lack of transparency in sourcing reduces the reliability of the information presented.
The article lacks clear attribution to specific reports or studies, and there is no disclosure of potential conflicts of interest or affiliations. This impacts the transparency of the reporting.