15 Essential PS4 Games To Add To Your Collection

Forbes - Feb 1st, 2025

The PlayStation 4 boasts an extensive library of games that highlight the console's diverse capabilities and long-lasting appeal. This collection of top PS4 games underscores the console's ability to support a wide range of genres, from adventure and RPGs to shooters and sports games, demonstrating the breadth of experiences available on Sony's platform. The list features critically acclaimed titles such as 'The Last of Us Part 2,' 'Red Dead Redemption 2,' and 'God of War,' which are praised for their storytelling, gameplay, and immersive worlds.

The significance of this list lies in its ability to showcase the PS4's impact on the gaming industry, offering players a robust selection of games that cater to various tastes and preferences. As the PS4 continues to be celebrated for its contributions to gaming, this compilation highlights why the console remains a favorite among players, despite newer generations. It illustrates the enduring legacy of the PS4, ensuring its place as one of the best gaming consoles ever released.

Sony Gaming Industry Play Station 4 Top Ps4 Games Naughty Dog

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article effectively highlights the strengths of the PS4's game library, offering an engaging overview of top titles that are well-regarded within the gaming community. It excels in clarity and readability, making it accessible to a broad audience. However, it could benefit from greater transparency in its selection methodology and more balanced representation of perspectives, including potential criticisms of the games. The lack of cited sources affects the perceived reliability of the information, and while the article remains relevant to PS4 users, it does not address broader industry trends or public interest topics. Overall, it serves as a useful guide for gamers looking to explore the PS4's offerings but lacks the depth to influence wider public discourse.

Accuracy

The article provides a list of highly recommended PS4 games, which aligns well with known critical and fan reception for these titles. The claim that the PS4 has an "epic back catalogue" and that many games could rank among the top ever made is generally supported by industry reviews and sales figures. However, the assertion about the PS4's unmatched genre diversity could benefit from more specific comparisons to other consoles. The descriptions of individual games are accurate in terms of gameplay and reception, but the article lacks citations or direct references to external sources for verification.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on highlighting the positive aspects of the PS4 games, which may lead to a perception of bias towards the console's strengths. While it mentions critical and fan reception, it does not address any criticisms or controversies associated with these games, such as technical issues or gameplay criticisms. This lack of counterbalancing perspectives could limit the article's comprehensive representation of the gaming landscape.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and uses clear, engaging language to describe each game, making it accessible to a broad audience. The logical flow from discussing the PS4's strengths to listing specific games helps maintain reader engagement. However, the use of subjective terms like "must-play" without context or criteria could affect the perceived neutrality of the recommendations.

Source quality

The article does not cite specific sources or reference authoritative reviews, which affects the perceived reliability of its claims. While the games listed are widely recognized and acclaimed, the absence of direct attribution to industry experts or publications diminishes the article's credibility. The analysis appears to be based on the author's personal experience and general industry knowledge, rather than diverse or authoritative sources.

Transparency

The article acknowledges a personal bias in the selection of games, which adds a layer of transparency regarding the author's perspective. However, it does not explain the methodology used to rank or select these games in detail, nor does it disclose any potential conflicts of interest, such as affiliations with game developers. This lack of methodological transparency may leave readers questioning the basis for the game's inclusion.